The Component Parts of the Price of Commodities Icon

January 22, 2020

In the rude state, price has one component= Wages

1 In the rude state of society, only the quantity of labour regulates the exchangeable value of commodities.

For example, in a nation of hunters, a beaver is twice as hard to kill than a deer.

  • A beaver is naturally exchanged for, or is worth, two deer.
  • The produce of two hours of labour should naturally be worth double the produce of one hour’s labour.

2 If one kind of work is harder, it naturally becomes worth more than an easier kind of work. The produce of one hour’s hard work may frequently exchange for the produce of two hour’s easy work.

3 Or if one kind of work requires specialized skills, the people’s esteem for such skills will naturally give it a higher value.

Such skills usually take time and effort to develop. The high price of skilled produce is a reasonable compensation for this time and effort in developing those skills. This compensation manifests as higher wages both in the advanced and rude state.

4 In the rude state, without the accumulation of stock, one’s work belongs solely to oneself.

In this case, the quantity of work is the only regulator of exchangeable value.

In the advanced state, price has three components= wages, profits, rent*

*Translator’s note= In Pantrynomics, wages are in the rude state because wages are the revenue of the worker or shudra class

The Second Component= Profits

5 In the advanced state, stock is accumulated.

Some people will supply this stock as materials to workers to be worked on. Those workers add value to those materials. The employers then sell their work to make a profit.

The exchangeable value of the finished product must include the=

  • price of those materials
  • wages of the workers
  • profits of the employer who risks his stock this way

The value added by the workers is composed of=

  • their wages,
  • the profits of their employer on the materials and wages he advanced

He would only advance his stock, in the form of wages and materials to those workers, if he could get more in return from their work. He would advance big stocks only if his profits were proportional to the size of his stock.

6 Profits of stock are not the same as the wages of management, although people may mistake them as the same.

They are regulated by different principles*.

*Translator’s note= In Pantrynomics, profit is the revenue of the business or vaesya class

Profits bear no proportion to the quantity or quality of management work. Profits are=

  • regulated by the value of the stock employed, and
  • proportional to the size of this stock.

*Translator’s note= In Pantrynomics, management is classified as value-maintaining effort and not value-adding

Let us suppose that=

  • The profits of manufacturing stock are 10% and there are two factories.
  • Each factory has 20 workers at £15 pounds a year each or £300 a year.
  • The coarse raw materials in Factory A cost only £700.
  • The finer raw materials in Factory B cost £7,000.
  • The capital annually employed in Factory A will be £1,000. [£700+£300]
  • The capital annually employed in Factory B will be £7,300. [£7,000+£300]

At 10% profits, the employer in Factory A will expect a yearly profit of £100 only. [£1,000*0.10]

  • The employer in Factory B will expect a profit of £730. [£7,300*0.10]
  • Their profits are very different but their management work may be nearly the same.

In big business, management is committed to an executive manager. His wages=

  • properly express the value of his management work
  • are determined by his skill and trustworthiness
  • bear no regular proportion to the size of the capital he manages

The owner of this capital still expects that his profit should bear a regular proportion to his capital even if he does almost no work. In the price of commodities, profits are different from wages. They are regulated by different principles.

7 In this state of things, the whole produce of work does not always belong to the worker.

He must share it with the owner of the stock. Wages and profits are not the only parts of the price of commodities.

The Third Component= Rent

8 As soon as land becomes private property, the landlords, like all other men, love to reap where they never sowed.

They demand a rent even for its natural produce. When land was not private property, its natural produce only cost the labourer the trouble of gathering them. When land becomes private property, he needs to pay=

  • for the licence to gather them, and
  • a share of his produce for the landlord.

This share is the rent of land. It is the third component part of price*.

*Translator’s note= In Pantrynomics, rent is the revenue of the warrior or ksattriya class